Vintage Chanel handbagby Melissa PetermanWe used three experiments to test the practical reliability of the two
designer handbags in question. Each experiment was conducted with equal strenuousness on a
Gucci handbag and a Chanel handbag of comparable size (about two liters). With each experiment we used fresh handbags.
Experiment #1
One of the most important jobs of a designer handbag is the ability to hold up to the everyday abuse doled out by a modern working woman. To test this capacity of the handbags we fastened the strap of each purse to a post, which was spun by a 10 hp lawn mower engine. The post applied an equal amount of centrifugal force to each designer handbag, causing a maximum angular velocity of 50 revolutions per minute. A dummy of mass 90kg was then hung across the bags' angular paths of motion to simulate a purse snatcher or other perpetrator. Damage to the handbags was then measured.
Experiment #2
The second most important capacity of the Gucci handbag and the Chanel handbag we compared was the ability of each bag to resist spillage of its unmentionable contents. To test this, we filled each designer handbag with tampons and dropped them unzipped from a second floor window of a men's college dorm building onto a busy sidewalk. We repeated this 10 times with each designer handbag and counted the number of ejected feminine hygiene implements after each drop.
Experiment #3
Our final test was to determine how well each designer handbag would stand up to the aftermath of a wild night on the town. We wanted to find out the extent of the bags' abilities to contain and recover from a drunken puking. To accomplish this we poured an equal amount of liquid projectile (two liters) from a funnel at a height of one meter. The greater than normal height was to approximate the speed and splatter effect of an actual puking. We measured the handbags' ability to catch the liquid and then had the bags dry cleaned and measured the residual fragrance. We obtained the liquid from the gutter outside the local bar at 1 am one Saturday morning.
Vintage Gucci HandbagAnalysis
Experiment #1
Each designer handbag in this experiment was swung around the post until it struck the dummy exactly 30 times. The bags were then examined. Afterward the bags were swung again until their straps broke. After the first 30 strikes, the Gucci handbag finish was scuffed and its stitches near the strap were beginning to pull apart. The chanel handbag was equally scuffed, but there were no evident signs of stress on the strap. However, a snap from one of the side pockets of the Chanel handbag was detached. In the second part of the experiment the strap of the Gucci handbag broke after 19 more rotations. Not surprisingly, the Chanel handbag lasted more than twice as long with 42 rotations.
Experiment #2
We filled each handbag with 22 tampons before each drop. We discovered that the chanel handbag was more likely to tip over upon impact (eight of 10 drops compared to five of 10 with the Gucci handbag), causing more of its contents to eject. We didn't correct for this considering tipping tendency a major factor in every day spilling incidents. The average number of tampons ejected from the Chanel handbag was 13.5. The average number ejected from the Gucci handbag was 8. On the fourth drop of the Chanel handbag several of the ejected items were picked up by a passer by, but were soon recovered.
Experiment #3
For the first part of this experiment, we had an intern hold the bags open as wide as possible while we poured the liquid. We then measured the amount of splatter not captured by the handbags. We also measured leakage of liquid from the seams of the bag. The gucci handbag failed to catch 340 mL of liquid while the Chanel handbag lost only 280 mL. We surmise this is because the Chanel handbag could be opened wider than the Gucci handbag. However, the Chanel handbag leaked more than the Gucci handbag. For the second part of this experiment, we dry cleaned the handbags and measured the aroma held by the bags. Each designer handbag exhibited a high level of lingering fragrance even after a second cleaning. The results of this test were inconclusive.
Conclusion Some of the tests applied to the designer handbags were inconclusive. The second part of experiment #1 and the first part of experiment #3 favored the
Chanel handbag, while experiment #2 favored the gucci handbag. Overall, we believe the
Chanel handbag is the better choice for practical use. But we warn that items intended to be kept unseen in a Chanel handbag should be secured with additional means. Any designer handbag should be cleaned several times after being used as a puke sack.
Suggestions for Further Study on
Designer Handbags We suggest further valuable studies be conducted on this important topic. Other experiments could be devised to test such capacities as standing up to backing over by an automobile, clandestinely packing food into a movie theater, accidental machine washings, and resisting animals searching for hidden treats. We suggest obtaining your designer handbag from designer direct outlet for a good deal. We also suggest including a cheap Walmart handbag along with designer handbag in these studies.
For more information: check out designer handbag, gucci handbag, chanel handbag
http://www.efashionhouse.com for good deals on designer handbags.
About the Author Mat Moniker is a writer for Innuity
Labels: authentic gucci handbags, chanel handbgs, designer handbags